Success Stories

---

Digital NABH Accreditation for 50‑Bed Hospital Chennai

Client: 50‑bed multi‑specialty hospital, Chennai
Objective: Achieve Digital NABH accreditation by demonstrating digitally managed processes, staff governance and integrated systems.
Duration: 10 weeks (assessment, enhancements, validation)

Challenge

The hospital aimed to be the first in its category to secure Digital NABH, requiring evidence that clinical and administrative processes were managed digitally and that disparate systems were integrated for reliable KPIs. Existing software modules (EMR, HIS, lab, pharmacy, billing, HR) were fragmented, with gaps in audit trails, role‑based access, digital SOPs and KPI reporting. The hospital needed feature enhancements, process redesign and staff enablement to meet NABH digital criteria.

Approach and Activities

• Gap  assessment against Digital NABH KPIs
  Mapped each NABH digital requirement to current software capabilities and      process maturity; produced a prioritized gap register.
• Software enhancement roadmap
  Specified functional changes: audit trails, role‑based access controls,      digital consent capture, timestamped clinical notes, e‑medication      reconciliation, lab result auto‑push, and billing‑EMR linkage.
• Systems integration
  Designed lightweight APIs and middleware to integrate EMR, HIS, lab,      pharmacy and billing so a single patient event generated consistent      records across modules.
• Process redesign and SOPs
  Rewrote clinical and administrative SOPs for digital workflows, defined      escalation paths, and created digital checklists for critical processes.
• Staff training and mock audits
  Conducted role‑based training, ran mock digital audits and refined      workflows based on findings.
• Validation      and documentation
  Compiled evidence packs, KPI dashboards and audit logs required for NABH      submission.

Implementation Highlights

• Auditability: Enabled immutable audit trails for clinical entries, medication  administration and billing events.
• Access  control: Implemented role‑based access with two‑factor authentication  for sensitive modules.
• Digital  SOPs and checklists: Converted key SOPs into digital checklists  accessible on clinician and nurse terminals.
• Integrated KPI dashboard: Real‑time dashboard showing Digital NABH KPIs — documentation completeness, medication reconciliation rate, handover compliance, infection control checks and turnaround times.
• Mock audit cycle: Two rounds of mock audits with corrective actions closed before final validation.

Outcomes and Final Results

Digital NABH ready; audit passed

Key final outcomes

• Digital  NABH readiness achieved with complete evidence packs and passing mock audits.
• Clinical  governance strengthened through digital SOPs, role clarity and auditability.
• Operational efficiency improved via integrated systems and faster lab result delivery.
• Patient      safety metrics improved with near‑universal medication reconciliation and complete documentation.
• Sustainable compliance model established with dashboards, daily checks and  quarterly re‑audits.

 Warehouse Inventory Optimisation for Small Logistics Company

Client: Small logistics company (single warehouse; 200+ SKUs)
Duration: 3 weeks (assessment, design, implementation)
Location: Client warehouse (Chennai area)

 

Challenge

The warehouse held 200+ parts with no catalogue or systematic identification. Staff spent excessive time locating parts, causing longer loading times, missed dispatch windows and reduced throughput. Inventory visibility and stock accuracy were poor.

Approach

• Rapid      diagnostic: Walk‑through, time‑motion observations of pick/pack/load      activities, and interviews with warehouse staff to map pain points and      peak workflows.
• Two‑pronged      solution: 
  • Digital       identification: Every inventory item was assigned a unique QR code linked       to a simple catalogue (SKU, description, bin location, quantity).
  • Physical       reorganisation: Items were classified into Runner, Repeater and Slow‑move       categories and placed using an IKEA‑style layout (logical zones, visual       cues, and ergonomic access).
• Process      changes: Standardised picking routes, a simple pick‑list app (mobile scan      + confirm), and a designated staging area for loading.
• Staff      enablement: Short training sessions and a one‑page SOP for scanning,      replenishment triggers and daily cycle counts

.

Implementation highlights

• QR      tagging: Printed and affixed QR labels to all 200+ parts and primary      storage locations; scanned into the catalogue on mobile devices.
• Zoning      & placement: 
  • Runner       products (high frequency) placed nearest to loading docks and at waist       height.
  • Repeater       products (moderate frequency) placed in adjacent aisles with clear       signage.
  • Slow‑move       items stored higher or in deeper racks.
• Visual      layout: Colour‑coded aisle markers and shelf labels; simple floor arrows      to guide pickers.
• Operational      rules: First‑in, first‑out for perishable/age‑sensitive parts; daily 15‑minute      morning check for replenishment needs.

Outcomes (Final results)

• Loading      time reduced by 55% (average time per load decreased from 40 minutes to 18      minutes).
• Pick      accuracy improved to 99.2% (from ~94%), reducing rework and customer      complaints.
• Inventory      search time cut by 70% for typical items; staff locate runner items within      30 seconds on average.
• Throughput      increased by 30% during peak shifts without additional headcount.
• Cycle      count variance reduced to <1.5% monthly, improving stock reliability.
• Space      utilisation improved through logical placement; freed up one pallet bay      for staging.
• Employee      satisfaction rose (qualitative feedback): staff reported less fatigue and      clearer workflows.
• Low      implementation cost with rapid ROI: QR labels, signage and minor racking      adjustments paid back within 6–8 weeks via labour savings and fewer      errors.

Client: Mid‑sized agarbatti (incense stick) factory

Consultant: Cimplivate (process improvement & operational excellence).
Duration: 4 Weeks.
Scope: Raw material feeding, rolling/dipping line, drying, packing.

Challenge (what the factory faced)

• High scrap and rework from inconsistent paste mix and uneven rolling.
• Frequent stoppages due to misfeeds and wrong packing counts.
• Skill‑dependent quality — outcomes varied by operator.
• Traceability gaps for defect root cause.

Our Approach 

Key considerations before design

• Where defects originate (material, machine, human).
• Cost vs. benefit of mechanical vs. visual poka‑yoke.
• Operator ergonomics and training needs.

Decision points

• Prioritize low‑cost, high‑impact fixes first.
• Use      layered defences: mechanical interlocks, visual cues, and simple sensors.
• Pilot      on one production line before plantwide roll‑out.

Poka‑Yoke Solutions Implemented

1. Material feed error‑proofing
   • Color‑coded hoppers and quick‑fit lids to prevent wrong ingredient loading.
   • Mechanical keying on hopper inlets so only correct containers fit.

            2.  Rolling/dipping consistency

• Fixed‑gap guides and depth stops on rolling fixtures to ensure uniform       paste thickness.
• Simple optical sensor that flags under/over‑thick sticks and diverts them to rework.

             3. Drying & handling

• Tray orientation pins so trays can only be loaded one way; misloaded trays trigger an alarm.
• Temperature lockout that prevents packing if drying chamber hasn’t reached  setpoint.

              4. Packing  accuracy

• Mechanical  counter with fail‑safe gate that prevents box sealing until the exact count is reached.
• Visual  checklist board at packing station with green/red indicators for each       step.

               5. Operator  aids & visual management

• One‑page SOPs laminated at each station; photo examples of acceptable vs. reject.
• Andon cord for immediate line stop and root‑cause capture.

Results (example, typical outcomes)

• Defect rate reduced by ~60% on pilot line.
• Line uptime improved ~18% due to fewer stoppages.
• Operator error incidents down ~70% after visual aids and mechanical keys.
• Faster  onboarding of new operators (training time cut by ~40%).